A ranked, written view of where AI realistically fits in your organisation.

An Assessment surfaces and ranks candidate AI use cases. It answers “where could AI apply here, and in what order should we look at it?” A Strategy turns that ranking into a sequenced, costed, resourced plan. The two pair well sequentially, Assessment first, Strategy second, but we deliver them as separate engagements, not as a bundle.

We say so, in writing. That happens. Sometimes the data is not in shape, sometimes the operating model is not ready, sometimes the workflows are too unstructured for current models. “Leave alone for now” is a real and frequent output of this engagement, and it is worth the price tag of the assessment to know that with confidence.

Not for the assessment itself. The data-readiness scoring is based on conversations with the people who own the data, plus a review of structure and access patterns where useful. Deep data work happens later, in a Create engagement, if and when one of the candidates is greenlit.

The people who do the actual operating work, supervisors, senior individual contributors, team leads. Executives are interviewed separately so the workshops stay candid. A workshop full of executives produces a different list than a workshop full of the people who run the workflows, and we want the latter.

Yes, but as separate engagements with a deliberate gap between them. The Assessment ends, you sit with the recommendation, you decide. If you want to act, the Create engagement is scoped and priced fresh, not pre-committed during the Assessment. We will not use the Assessment as a sales funnel into a build.